Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Google. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Google. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

Κυριακή 27 Σεπτεμβρίου 2015

Your Mobile Portfolio: Make it Your Own



BY LOWELL BALLARD


Lowell Ballard, Director of Geospatial Solutions for Timmons Group, discusses the importance of making users feel like a part of your company’s ecosystem by developing a mobile portfolio.


In last month’s article, I focused on the concept of how to roll out your mobile offerings and creating a mobile portfolio. The article, “David or Goliath: Your Mobile GIS Portfolio,” centered around key decisions any successful company will face when delving into the production of mobile applications. This key decision centers on creating a single (typically larger) application that works to solve many business needs at once or, conversely, creating a set of smaller (more focused) applications. These smaller applications typically are lighter in scope, complexity and are honed in on a particular business need. I also previously highlighted the importance of being an advocate for the creation of smaller more focused applications, if at all possible. It’s much easier to turn around a dinghy versus the Titanic and this was a key argument for advocating the development of smaller applications.

This month I will discuss some important things to consider when creating smaller applications as well as the successful development of a “portfolio” for your mobile products. I will use Google as an example because they are a highly-complex organization with aggressive growth strategies. Google has many products in their portfolio. It’s their corporate goal to create an “ecosystem” of ways to interact with you, get your attention, solve a problem for you and of course, drive a few highly-tailored ads your way in the process. Examples of these applications include Google+, Google Search, Google Play, and everyone’s favorite – Google Maps. Every one of these applications resides on my iPad. While Google wants your experience to be consistent and positive in all of these applications, they also made a concerted effort not to unify them into the “Google Universal Engine” iPad application. They are part of the Google Ecosystem – but they are a collection of dinghies, not the Titanic.

In order to make your users feel like they are part of your “ecosystem” you have to ensure they know they are working with one of your applications. A key consideration comes early in the process through identification and brand standardization. This means many things to a variety of people; however, at its core it’s a very simple concept. As an organization you need to have standards for how you present yourself. The most common sense standard is your logo. While it doesn’t always have to be exactly the same – it needs to have a set of options that are consistent. Examples may include a color version and a black-and-white version, or perhaps a vertical and horizontal version. The important thing is that a set that should be used across all media types (digital, print, etc.). If you are creating a series of mobile applications, it should be understood that the logo needs to exist and should be consistent from application to application. Another, perhaps less intuitive, consideration is the fonts you use in your applications. Again, fonts can very subtle or very compelling. Fonts alone can very easily help you to identify with a company. If you look at Google’s previous font – it is highly consistent both in the company name and product offering.




This connects us to them and ensures we know we’re part of the Google ecosystem and have not jumped off to another application. Next month I will continue on this theme of creating your own ecosystem and ensuring that, when users are part of it, they know they’re part of it – whichever part that may be.

Κυριακή 6 Σεπτεμβρίου 2015

New Maps feature shows that Google tracks your every move



By Aleks Buczkowski






Most of us are aware that Google collects plenty of data about each internet user. We just don’t realise how much data it actually is and what the company does with it.

Google Location History is service that allowed to visualise your exact path on Google Maps of the last hour, day, week, month or even a year. The website was quietly existing for couple of year already but Google didn’t really advertised it. Until now. Few weeks ago Google rebranded it to Google Maps Timeline and added as a feature to Google Maps.

Google says that Timeline will help you to add spatial layer to your memories. In my opinion what it actually does is to show users that Google not only stores the information about our whereabouts but also deeply analyses it. The website clearly shows that Google analyses when and where your smartphone was. It knows that if you stay in a particular location everyday from midnight to 5am it’s most likely you home. Similarly it knows where you work. Based on your travel GPS patterns Google also knows if you commute by public transit, car or bike. By linking your longer stays to particular locations it knows where and how long do you shop or work-out. Moreover if you’re also using Google Photos, the company will link your pictures to a specific day and location.

It’s a lot of contextual data analyzed with a single aim – to make you click on the ad displayed you by Google.

But the location is of course one of the contexts. In fact there are a lot of other Google services which show that the company is carefully tracking your online activity. Google search history knows what you searched for and on which ads you clicked. The YouTube watch history lists all videos that you’ve ever watched on YouTube. YouTube also stores all your queries. Moreover Google has access to list of all devices that ever assessed your Google account. Google also lists an overview of all Google services you use in the Google dashboard. Finally all this information is combined and analysed to create your Google Ads profile.

With Google Maps Timeline Google is clearly trying to be more open. For many it might be just more scary…


Google introduces new pricing plans for Maps API



By Aleks Buczkowski



google_money 


Back in 2012 Google introduced fees for developers using Maps API. Developers were offered Google Maps Premium – a paid for service starting from $10,000 a year, which also offers branded maps and custom uses of Google Maps. If they opt not to pay for this, fees were $4 per 1,000 page loads over the 25,000 per day – or $10 per Street View load over the 10,000 per day. Smaller and bigger players like Foursquare immediately started to switch to other platforms and after just couple of weeks Google had to quickly lower prices. The mess of these business decisions was still visible in APIs pricing plans.

This week together with a new logo Google has finally brought in much needed change to this pricing. The Maps API team said:


Today we’re introducing a simple and flexible option for developers to instantly and easily scale with these Web Service APIs, by opening them up to pay-as-you-go purchasing via the Google Developers Console.

In this new purchasing structure, the Google Maps APIs (Geocoding, Directions, Distance Matrix, Roads, Geolocation, Elevation, and Time Zone) will be free of charge for the first 2,500 requests per day, and developers will pay $0.50 USD per 1,000 additional requests up to 100k requests per API per day. Developers with over 100k requests per day will get a premium pricing model.

Frankly speaking it’s quite expensive. Let’s say that I will make an app which gets 100.000 downloads in the first week. I will have to pay Google for 99750 requests * $0.50 = $48.750. Hmmm… I’ll probably use OpenStreetMap.

Πέμπτη 13 Αυγούστου 2015

We need GIS apps which are super simple to use



By Matt Sheehan





A history of GIS App Complexity
I’m afraid its true. We’ve been building GIS apps which are too complex. Too many GIS apps need users to be trained before use.

GIS has a history of complex and confusing apps
In 2005 Google Maps introduced us to simplicity. True, their target audience were consumers, not the enterprise, but still the simplicity was a thing of beauty. GIS has been pushing out applications filled with (too many) tools. Tools which are complex to use. Applications which are not intuitive. Applications which need training.
New Non-GIS Users

We are in the midst of geospatial revolution, driven by cloud and mobile technology. The geo world is being turned on its head. Traditional GIS users are being joined by a new far wider user base: non-GIS users. That’s not just consumers, but private organizations recognizing their business intelligence (BI) software is only giving them part of the story. By your staff who are looking to location based technology to improve how they work, and improve their organizational insight to make better decisions.


New focus on GIS Simplicity
GIS is complex. Let’s not pretend. But its our job as GIS professionals to make the user experience simple. Let’s not force our users to jump through hoops to get their work done… confusing workflows, menu after menu, too many tools. I like the book “Don’t Make me Think: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability”. It should be mandatory reading for all GIS developers and development companies.
Simple GIS apps

As a company we take simplicity seriously. We realise we are now serving a wider audience, who are looking to location technology to end their use of pen and paper in the field, to view and analyse their data in new ways. As an example, we have been developing offline enabled mobile applications for a number of years. Our goal was to make going offline a 2 button click process. First download the basemap data you need (satellite, roads etc) then go offline.


How about integrating ArcGIS with Google?


Our Universal Map Viewer for ArcGIS is designed for GIS and non-GIS folk alike. We have put much focus on simplicity. We rely on users like you to give us feedback on usability. Let us know if you’d like to demo the app, we would love your feedback. Call us on 801-733-0723.

Τετάρτη 5 Αυγούστου 2015

3D Mapping with Google Smartphones



BY REBECCA MAXWELL




The human brain is a remarkable instrument when it comes to navigation and creating mental maps. A person is able find his or her way through an unfamiliar place while simultaneously producing and storing visual maps of that area in the mind for later use. Of course, some individuals are better at this than others, and paper and electronic maps are helpful navigation tools as well. Up until now, though, technology has not been able to match this innate mapmaking capacity of mankind.

All of that could change with Project Tango from Google. Project Tango is a new initiative from the technology giant that could revolutionize how the world is mapped and navigated. Google announced in February of 2014 that the company has built a prototype Android smartphone that acquires the dimensions of a place just by being moved around it. Someone with one of these smartphones in his or her hand, for instance, could progress around a room, like a kitchen or bedroom. The phone picks up the dimensions of the room as it is moved around, creating a 3D map of it using the data it obtained.

The fundamental goal of Project Tango, according to Google, is to create detailed indoor maps. The 5-inch smartphone is equipped with a regular 4-megapixal camera but also includes a motion sensing camera as well as a depth sensor, all built into the back of the phone. These special sensors pick up what is in front of them using depth perception and spatial awareness, making over a quarter million measurements every second. The phone also incorporates a low-power computer-vision processor that actually creates the 3D maps. This technology is not all that different from how NASA’s rovers explore the surface of Mars. Only this type of technology can now fit in the palm of your hand.

There seems to be a wide range of possibilities as to what this technology could do. By creating extremely detailed maps of the world, and indoor spaces in particular, this smartphone could ultimately give precise directions to any given point. There could be incredible ways to use this technology in order to help the visually impaired navigate places they have never been before. This technology could have other implications as well such as ability to allow users to play hide-and-seek in your house with a virtual character. It could also allow a person to walk into a storeand know exactly where the item is that he or she is looking for.


PROJECT TANGO FROM GOOGLE

Project Tango, with its advanced mapmaking technology, is still in its infancy. So far, Google has only released 200 prototype devices to developers with the hopes of seeing what it is capable of. They have high expectations, however. Google has stated that this smartphone could capture a wealth of data never before accessible to app designers and be used for room and building planning among many other functions. It is yet to be seen whether Project Tango will dramatically alter the world of navigation, but the leader of Project Tango, Johnny Lee, says that the goal of this venture is to bring a human-like sense of understanding of space and motion to mobile devices.

Visit: Project Tango

Watch the video:



Πέμπτη 23 Ιουλίου 2015

Google's Waze Crowdsourced Traffic and Navigation App is a Hit, But How Does It Impact Privacy, the Law and Google Maps?




(PRNewswire) — Research and Markets


(http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/2nqmdn/googles_waze) has announced the addition of the "Google's Waze Crowdsourced Traffic and Navigation App is a Hit, But How Does It Impact Privacy, the Lawand Google Maps?" report to their offering.




The ability to quickly assimilate and analyze Big Data is providing new ways for humans to take more control over their on-road experience. One of those ways is Waze, which is now the world's largest crowdsourced traffic and navigation app, with more than million users in countries. Waze users share real-time roadway and traffic information with the Waze network and each other. By connecting drivers to one another, Waze is creating local driving communities that work together to improve road experiences by helping users avoid accidents, sidestep traffic jams, find the best prices on gasoline, avoid traffic tickets, and find deals at local stores.

Waze, which was launched in Israel, as a competitor to Google Maps and Apple Maps, has so much to offer that Google - whose Google Maps application is the leading traffic and navigation app, and the sixth most widely used smartphone app.

However, some of the very capabilities that make Waze the most feature-rich, interactive traffic and navigation app also raise questions about its impacts on privacy, law enforcement, and its coexistence with Google Maps. This report discusses key capabilities and benefits of the Waze app, and analyzes those impacts.

Key Topics Covered:

1. Introduction

2. Crowdsourcing Helped Build Waze's First Maps, and Continues Daily

3. Heavy User Engagement Benefits Waze and its Advertisers

4. How Waze Benefits Google

5. Waze is a Hot Propertybut Faces Serious Challenges and Detractors

For more information visithttp://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/2nqmdn/googles_waze

Media Contact:

Laura Wood, +353-1-481-1716, Email Contact



To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/googles-waze-crowdsourced-traffic-and-navigation-app-is-a-hit-but-how-does-it-impact-privacy-the-law-and-google-maps-300117864.html

SOURCE Research and Markets
Contact:
Research and Markets
Web: http://www.researchandmarkets.com
Source

Τρίτη 14 Ιουλίου 2015

Steve Coast on OpenStreetMap, HOT and paying it forward



OpenStreetMap was ready in 2012 as Google began charging for the Google maps API — it became the preferred mapping platform and primary data source for a growing list of companies around the world. Since then the power of OSM has only grown. Why? Because it has built a global community of passionate contributors that supply and verify local, accurate and up-to-date data, and that data is still free to use with just a simple credit to OSM and its contributors. Recently, Directions caught up with Steve Coast, founder of OpenStreetMap, co-founder of CloudMade and currently the head of OSM at Telenav, to learn more.

Q: What was the inspiration for creating OpenStreetMap?

A:Back in 2004, there was a lack of available map and location data in the UK. However, there was this newly emerging information tool called Wikipedia that was slowly becoming a powerhouse. Based on its model and success, I was inspired to create its counterpart with respect to maps.

Q: What resources and solutions are available for businesses, schools and organizations?
A:Currently, OpenStreetMaps is being utilized in schools, colleges and universities across a variety of educational disciplines including geography, mathematics, ecology, community planning, government and Information Technology – with some educators contributing to the existing OSM database. What’s interesting is that in the process of using OSM and contributing data, students develop real-world IT skills needed to process data and gain valuable knowledge in the fields of Geographic Information Systems, planning and community development.

On the business front, OSM is used in a wide variety of consumer products ranging from mobile applications like Telenav’s Scout to automobiles currently on the road. Businesses are realizing that alternatives to OSM are much pricier, and lack the quality or real-time data updates afforded to OSM by its more than million contributors.

Q: What is the relationship with hotosm.org? Are there other similar organizations? How do these organizations reinforce your global mission to encourage collaboration?
A: The Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team depends heavily on OSM to do their humanitarian response and economic development work. From their website: “the organization acts as a bridge between the traditional Humanitarian Responders and the OpenStreetMap Community. Moreover, HOT works both remotely and physically in countries to assist [in] the collection of geographic data, usage of that information and training others in OpenStreetMap. HOT believes that free geodata can help save and improve lives in times of political crisis and natural disasters leveraging [the] network of OpenStreetMap contributors, and by traveling to help people map their own communities and make that data available.” Recently, and according to Wired, the aftermath of the Nepal earthquake this year saw “2,182 digital volunteers providing 14,700 km2 worth of high resolution satellite imagery that identified approximately 3,128 damaged buildings.”

Similar organizations include the following:
UK and US Red Cross teams
GIS-compatible data from GADM, a spatial database of the world's administrative areas
Natural Earth and the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
UN group UNOSAT

Q: How can folks best engage and pay it forward?
A: When I created OSM more than 10 years ago, I was just out to create a map – and that’s it. Since then, the tool and its uses have evolved and I believe that it’s an amazing thing that there are people involved in the [OSM] project that want to do socially beneficial things with the tool and that they’re interested in OSM from a different perspective. If folks want to engage with OSM, start by getting to know the tools and the community of users that are currently leveraging the tool. And while they’re at it, check out Telenav’s Scout mobile app to see how companies are using that data.

Interested in knowing more about Steve Coast and what’s next for OSM? Check out stevecoast.com.


Κυριακή 12 Ιουλίου 2015

Quest for Maps: Boon or Bane for Geospatial Industry







In 2003, while visiting the Esri Campus in Redlands, I got my first exposure to the geospatial content aggregation programme called Geography Network. Dozens of desktop servers were networked to create a platform for Esri users to populate their maps and share them with other users through the Geography Network.

Come 2005 and Google launched its first ever aggregated and organised geospatial content in public domain at a negligible cost (almost free of cost). The move made billions of users around the world gain access to maps and satellite images. Microsoft followed suit with its own programme called Microsoft Virtual Earth, which eventually came to be called as Bing Maps. The ever expanding and burgeoning navigation market added a new dimension to overall value of geospatial content, triggering big acquisitions of Tele Atlas by TomTom, valued at about $ 4.3 Billion. And, fearing growing competition from Google, Nokia too jumped into the ball game and went on to acquire Navteq at an unimaginable price of $8.1 Billion.

Despite the fact that Apple didn’t join the bandwagon, businesses across the world continued to rake in the moolah and transactions close to $25 billion dollars on account of geospatial content were carried out from 2004 to 2009. In fact, acquisition of MapInfo by Pitney Bowes also found motivation in Pitney Bowes’ quest for having its own exclusive geospatial information and software capabilities.

While building exclusive self-owned geospatial content empire, big IT and telecommunication giants acquired a range of small, medium and large geospatial companies. Their quest for the acquisitions continued until recently when Google bought Skybox, offering a constellation of small satellites to constantly monitor and update each and every activity happening on the face of the planet earth. Additionally, since social media is the latest buzzword and an easy access tool for data, various social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin are building their own platforms for using geospatial information in their respective business processes.

Acquisitions, buy-outs and partnerships are reverberating on the business front, hence comes the time to monetise such investments. Google, with its largest IT machinery, managed to leverage its outreach to monetise and harness the value of its investments through efficient advertising revenue streams and online navigation tools that are available on smartphones. Furthermore, Google went on to offer geospatial software solutions, bundled with its geospatial data suit to large businesses and government organisations. Despite all of this, the technology giant finally showed a sign of losing its faith in geospatial exclusivity by terminating its software solutions group in February this year; and offered compensation to its large customer base for withdrawing itself from professional geospatial market.

Following this move by Google, the uncertainty over Microsoft Bing Maps was looming. The clouds of uncertainty hovering over Microsoft Bing Maps winked today, when it offered to collaborate and share its platform, people and data with Uber.

The story of Nokia is known to one and all. Probably, the acquisition of highly valued Navteq marked beginning of its downfall as the investment as huge as this wasn’t easy to be recovered for an engineering company like Nokia. Changes in PND based navigation market took TomTom by surprise; its revenues continued to fall on a regular basis and brought it almost to a closure. But, thanks to Apple’s sudden realisation and affection for maps, and exclusivity of content by other big players, TomTom found ground and trotted towards economic recovery by selling and reselling its geospatial content to Apple.

This makes me ponder – how all of this happened over a period of last one decade? Who has been behind this upsurge and growth of geospatial content? How come geospatial caught overnight attention of Google, Microsoft and Nokia? Or have there been geospatial champions who attributed to this revolution? Of course, competent geospatial professionals were the backbone of this movement, though it would be difficult to attribute this upsurge to them, officially.

While tracing the movement of few geospatial professionals in last 12 to 15 years, it is imperative to understand their extraordinary vision towards making geospatial a commodity. After having been denied opportunities by leading geospatial companies, they did venture out and joined hands with large IT and Telecommunication companies to create huge markets and ultimately succeeded in their mission of making geospatial information a public commodity. And it’s the same set of people who are moving on towards setting next frontiers for geospatial market including business intelligence, target advertising, media and entertainment, social media, e-commerce and Internet of Things.

But why am I concerned today? The future is promising and the geospatial industry is expanding and growing to its fullest potential. How does it matter to me as a geospatial advocate if big players are making an entry or an exit? Or for that matter losing or gaining money in their businesses. Ultimately, I should be looking at the growth and maturity of geospatial industry and nothing beyond. Yes, actually I am in a state of flux, where excitement is challenged by equal, if not more, sense of concern.

Did we oversell dreams, which eventually caused exit of big players? If so, then did we take lessons from our earlier experiences? Seems like ‘yes’ and ‘no’. Despite hundreds of billions of dollars having been invested in geospatial capabilities in last one decade, we still do not see an organised and mature geospatial industry. We are, time and again, debating on setting up mechanisms and methodologies to assess return on investments. We are yet to fully evolve and integrate geospatial workflows with user industries. None of the significantly large IT, Telecommunication and Engineering companies came forward to invest and strengthen geospatial business and practices. There is not even a single 5 billion plus geospatial company, we are yet to have one. But how does it affect? Yes it does, long term business value and sustainable growth is driven by constant investment and improvements in overall industrialisation, capacity and infrastructure supported by cutting edge technical, financial and managerial equity.

We, as geospatial industry, need to develop our capabilities and serve the needs of user industries instead of creating buy back oriented captive plants of geospatial content. In order to make attract constant investments towards improving the quality and currency of geospatial content, we need to enhance its economy of scale by serving to larger number of organisations across different industries, globally. The resort will make geospatial content more service oriented, solutions more valuable, products more affordable, investments more steady, innovations more open, and companies more profitable. This will ultimately move the industry towards business maturity and multiplying sustainable growth for industry. 


Τετάρτη 8 Ιουλίου 2015

Google tracks hellish wildfire season in the American West



Google has created the 2012 US Wildfire Crisis Map to dynamically track the four dozen wildfires blazing across the United States, mostly in the West.

The map, built on its Crisis Response platform, is tracking about 50 fires, including the 100,000-acre Clay complex in Utah and the dangerous Waldo Canyon fire that is threatening the city of Colorado Springs. The map tracks the fires themselves, including their extent, information on suppression efforts, evacuation status, and the locations of shelters.

Google has pulled together data on fire perimeters from the US Geological Survey and InciWeb, shelter information from the Red Cross, satellite info from DigitalGlobe, and fire weather information from NOAA's Storm Prediction Center. Local-level data has been drawn from the State of Colorado Division of Emergency Management, Utah Division of Emergency Management, and other sources. This information has been plotted in layers across Google Maps and Google Earth.

The interface allows users to "turn on and off the layers of information" using a checkbox in the right-side panel. A "Share" button up top allows you to capture the URL or the embed code. A KML (keyhole markup language) file of the Waldo fire allows you to view that most dangerous of fires in great detail in Google Earth.

On the LatLong Blog, Pete Giencke of Google's Crisis Response Team encourages users to provide the team with data requests, to enrich the mapping possibilities during the fire season.
Turning data into usable information in a crisis

Giencke, a GIS data engineer, told Ars that the main crux of his efforts is working with partners to ensure that their (often GIS-specific) data is more usable and discoverable by those in a crisis situation.

"Our partners produce great datasets, sometimes in a way a lay audience has limited access to–in a crisis situation we can’t expect them to be downloading third-party programs or learning new data formats. So our charge on the tools side is to make the visualization of the data intuitive for a non-GIS user, make the interface easy to use, and enable the ready sharing of the data, e.g. with friends and family, via their social network of choice."

To do that, Crisis Response uses a number of tools that are designed to render huge amounts of data quickly and graphically. They use open source and publicly available tools as much as possible, including an App Engine backend to host the data, JavaScript, and CSS. They use Google JS Test to test.

The front end is created using Closure, an open-sourced Google tool that provides a framework for JavaScript and handles compilation, leaving a very small JS footprint, scriptwise.

For the crisis map application, they again use open source and publicly available tools, including a Google App Engine back-end to host the application, and JavaScript (Closure, Google Maps API V3) and CSS on the front-end. For mobile use, the Closure tools, like the compiler, help reduce the footprint of the application and improve cross-browser/device compatibility.

"GIS nerds like me get really excited about the kinds of data out there we can use," he said. But that data is not often user-friendly, so for the wildfire map, and other crisis projects, the data is treated via OGC open standard, enabling complex data sets to be read efficiently.

"Some of the data sets we get can be one to two gigabytes," he explained. "But by using, say, Mercator map tiles, we can produce 256-by-256 pixel renderings (i.e. tiles) of the data, and overlay those tiles atop the map where appropriate. By slicing up the data, users can efficiently, quickly zoom in and move around, where otherwise you'd quickly bog down."

Crisis data is the least abstract data imaginable. It is data that saves lives and homes and communities. So making sure it is quickly and clearly accessible is paramount. Evacuation routes out of a fire situation or a flood or hurricane can be hundreds of megabytes. But the Crisis Group uses Fusion tables and can get them to render out at 200 megabytes on a mobile phone.

"We’re targeting people affected by a disaster, often these folks have only their smartphones and tablets as a vehicle to finding relevant crisis-related information," said Giencke, so it's helpful to do "anything we can do to scale our ability to serve data to them more efficiently."
A brief history of crisis tech

Humans have been mapping crises since there have been maps and crises. But modern crisis mapping really came into its own with the development in Kenya of the Ushahidi crowdsourced platform. Originally created by Erik Hersman, Ory Okolloh (now Google's policy manager for Africa), Juliana Rotich, David Kobia, and others, it was first employed during the election violence in Kenya in 2008. It has since been used in dozens of places, from the Haiti earthquake to the tsunami in Japan.

Google's Crisis Response group, however, reaches beyond mapping. Its first undertaking was in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in the Gulf, where the company created overlays of storm information.

In the wake of the earthquake in Haiti, Google built Person Finder, to allow 'individuals to post and search for the status of relatives or friends affected by a disaster." Searchers could update information on missing persons to the Finder. During the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, they provided aMODIS satellite viewer of the spill's spread using images from NASA.

Regarding the 2012 US Wildfire Crisis Map, however, not everyone is a fan. Although maps such as Google's are more accessible, wildfire professionals see them as problematic, not so much for what they do or do not include in terms of data, but in their implied message.

"The new corporate maps tend not to be interested in helping educate the public about fire’s natural role in the ecosystem," Prof. Mike Medler told Ars. Medler is the chair of the Environmental Studies program at Western Washington University's Huxley College of the Environment and an expert in mapping wildfires. "Instead we see an explosion of 'disaster maps' and 'crisis maps,' often mapping dozens of fires that are no more a 'disaster' or a 'crisis' than a flood occurring on a wild river in the back country, or a particularly cold winter killing elk in a wilderness area."
Features

The Crisis Response platform allows Google to respond to a crisis by, among other things:
Creating a resource page with emergency information and tools.
Launching Google Person Finder to connect people with friends and loved ones.
Hosting a Crisis Map with authoritative and crowd-sourced geographic information.

It provides crisis responders with the following tools:
  • Google public alerts
  • Person Finder
  • Custom maps
  • Google Earth
  • Google Fusion Tablets
  • Shareable documents and spreadsheets
  • Google websites